Why Is It So Expensive to Build An SEG?

This blog is dedicated to the people out there who barely passed high school science but think they can build an SEG, or even for those that are highly skilled professionals who think they can build one. The concept is simple, yet amazingly complex at the same time and reading different forums and discussions about this throughout the internet, I thought it would be a good idea to shed some light on this specific subject to answer people's questions and shut some other people up for a while.

Let me start with the basics... the SEG is made up of thousands of parts, not just a couple of ring magnets and cylinder magnets like it appears at a glance. Each of the components in the SEG have to be made from the same exact mold and material, meaning you can't use another batch of copper in a second pass to make additional rings or rollers, it's all or nothing. Not only that, but the materials, once processed and created, have to be machined down to micron specifications. That's basically within the same precision as the thickness of a human hair. The physics required is that every material throughout every ring and roller must be processed at the same time so that the atoms "match" and their molecular structure is consistent across the entire machine. In order to achieve the magnetization required to imprint the rings and rollers with the appropriate magnetic fields, a special machine is required to do so. This is because it imprints both AC and DC current at once, using very large amounts of both. This machine that was used to do this specifically is custom built, it isn't one you can buy, and there are only a few places in the world that have the capability of creating this machine. When professor Searl worked for a power company in his younger years, he had access to this equipment but today, they are not as easily attained. This is why you can't just run out and buy some magnets to make them spin in your garage and make power. You could probably demonstrate the simpler concepts with it, such as how Rochin and Godin (Google it) did and were able to show that the effect was real. This isn't "pseudoscience" like so many skeptics call it, there is solid scientific documentation on their experiment and results. Just because some people can't grasp or understand what they have discovered, or don't understand the physics of it themselves, doesn't make it pseudoscience. This same pseudoscience that the "real" scientists refer to is what has sparked innovation and new scientific discoveries for hundreds of years, not just what the lab rats do.

So here is what it comes down to... if you wanted to build an SEG, you would need to have access to the powders and raw materials such as copper and neodymium. You would also need the machines to press the neodymium and other materials (such as tin) and the ability to "treat" the neodymium to prevent corrosion. This is commonly achieved in an argon gas chamber. This is a very difficult process and requires special equipment that would cost you thousands, if not tens of thousands of dollars, probably more. Once you have these materials created providing you know how to create and process them, you then need to machine them down on a special lathe that can shave the materials down to millionths of an inch without compromising the structure of the material (such as cracks or blemishes). This takes extensive time as well as money for the equipment to accomplish this, not to mention all of the equipment for weighing and measuring. Aside from all of the processing and materials required, it won't help you at all if you don't understand the math behind it, which is a closely guarded secret of Searl's even though he explains his principles using the Law of Squares. Without all of these things, you can't even begin to assemble an SEG, even if you had the specifications. Still think it's so simple? Do you have the money and resources to build one? I implore you to try then.... it will only be for the good of mankind.

I've followed Professor Searl's work for quite some time and his concepts are legitimate and scientifically sound. I have many valuable resources that I could share, but not unless people are really interested in them and for the right reasons. If I could, I would build an SEG since I have most of the information available to do so, but I know damn well that it takes a team of highly skilled, trustworthy individuals with the time, dedication, motivation and resources to make it happen. That in itself can be a greater challenge than proving something scientifically. It doesn't take a scientist to figure that out, just common sense.

Our Evolutionary Fork in the Road...

So I've been doing a fair amount of research and study over the last few months, specifically on advanced physics, quantum mechanics, quantum thermodynamics, and several other areas of science that just make me realize how truly disconnected our understanding of our physical world is. One thing that gave me hope was a recent article that discussed how physics and chemistry TOGETHER have brought together new findings in biology, which are bringing together these fields into a more connected framework of understanding. This is a great achievement as far as I'm concerned and I hope to see more of it. Even though we have evolved and we have created many amazing things from our current understanding of science, this doesn't mean that our understanding is near complete or for that matter, even correct. Here is an analogy... Let's say that you and someone else are standing in the same room, 90 degrees apart from one another. There is a piece of black paper in the room at eye level with where both of you can see. To one person, this paper looks like a long skinny line that is barely visible and appears to take up less space, to the other it looks like a flat piece of paper obstructing their view that takes up more space. This is the same problem with scientists today. One person's view can't be different from the other and each will beat each other to death trying to prove that their perspective or view is the "right" one. The fact is that they are both right. This was what turned physics upside-down with Einstein's equations versus Newton's. Before Einstein and Newton were deemed "geniuses", they were thought of as idiots and laughed at for their ideas. Some of the great men of this world were persecuted for their ideas, which later led to evolutionary leaps and bounds of technology and mankind. We look back and still don't pay credit to these people and at the same time, we continue to do the same thing today. One person in particular I am referring to is a man by the name of Professor John Searl. I've watched this man spend most of his time defending himself rather than making his idea available, which I will elaborate on shortly after my rant about our evolution.

Now, the reason for this blog is to rant about a few things on my mind that have to do with where we are as a race of intelligent beings. As we have evolved, we are now at a point where unlike in our very recent past, we now have the ability to prevent certain events the would result in our extinction. We have been fortunate enough to not have to endure such a threat (that we are aware of) but as a result of our ignorance and the greed of the few and powerful, we are at an evolutionary fork in the road. It is fast approaching. Down one path, it is a short and gloomy one, where global warming (whether man made or not), disease, starvation and a slow death await and eventually lead to our demise and extinction as a race. The other path is one of enlightenment and change, a true leap in evolutionary terms and has no end near in sight. The choices we have already made have led us to this fork in the road. If we don't make the right decision this time, and soon, we won't have the luxury of deciding. One person can't make this decision, and if we leave it to the minds of the greedy and powerful, the "conventional" and "orthodox" thinkers or the people in positions of influence because of their money, we are surely doomed. The people who are tired of the few controlling the needs and wants of the many are the ones whose right and decision it needs to be in order for change to occur. It is on this ground that our battle must begin and we will need to fight and die on this same ground for the fate of OUR future. Billionaire oil moguls and coal mine owners don't care about you and I and making sure we have energy to meet their needs... they care about how they can make more money by not meeting our needs, when they won't even live long enough to spend half of that money. You've seen it, we all have. I'm not saying that this is every rich person's thinking. But, just because someone who is wealthy gives money to charities doesn't make them "giving" when most of their motives are for tax write offs. At the surface it seems philanthropic and genuine, but it is deceptive and misleading. If you think they are so willing to give their money away, see what happens with these people when their money is being threatened to be TAKEN away. They will stop at nothing to make sure they can continue to make money and keep the status-quo. Even if took all of the money they already had to ensure that a steady stream would keep coming, they would spend every penny. You don't see Trump building free housing, do you? There are some people in this world that care about ensuring our future generations the ability to take the next step forward and continue to better ourselves and our understanding of the universe and what we come from... and there are those who only care about how they are going to spend their money today and their ability to keep on spending money tomorrow. There are those who can think openly and objectively about science, people who still know the power of imagination and there are those that are closed thinkers, blinded by arrogance and ignorance. The sad and more disturbing thing is that the world is mostly controlled by the closed thinkers, the powerful, the greedy... and we are the people that choose them and put them there. Change is a natural part of nature, everything in our existence changes. Without it, we are nothing. The more we fight it and try to prevent it, the faster we fall into the forgotten memory of what the human race "was" as we approach extinction at break-neck speeds. This is why we are at a fork in the road... are we going to continue to allow changes in our thinking and challenge views of physics, politics, religion and the such, which leads us down a more enlightened path.... or are we going to keep blinders on and continue down a linear path of self-destruction?

If you're still following my rant, this is where I'd like to talk about Professor Searl and how he is an example of everything I just talked about. In today's day and age, his story is similar to that of some of the other great thinkers of our time. He has spent most of his life defending himself against the closed thinkers and the so-called "experts" of our time. He has introduced a new perspective on something that will lead to the greatest changes ever known. He has created a device that generates sustainable electricity from the energy that is untapped and pervades our entire universe. That's right... no more oil money for the greedy, the powerful, the oil moguls, the corrupt decision makers. Do you think that the same people who control almost everything we depend on to survive, the same people who will do anything to keep their money flowing, aren't threatened by this? The difference today is that with the power of technology and the speed of communication (thanks to the internet), there is no way to prevent information from being shared by the masses... it is one of the few things in the world that can't be controlled anymore. Most people won't care about the principles and physics to help them understand what an amazing thing this man has done, but there a few that do. If you are one of them, I'll share some things with you in my next blog that I hope you find enlightening. For most people, they just want to see it work and don't care how or why. The problem is that most of the "experts" (most, not all) don't mind change if it's at the top, not the bottom. By this, I am referring to the "laws" that have been used by the orthodox scientific community as a foundation for all scientific theory. These same people are the ones that claim Professor Searl's idea is nonsense and seek ways to discredit him just because he is not one of the "experts" and has a more unorthodox view. This is the same thing that happened to people like Einstein, Newton, Tesla, Maxwell, Galileo, and many more. It is a shame that someone with such an amazing idea has to spend his life to defend it when unlike others in the past, this one idea alone can and will shape the future of mankind for centuries to come. It is my prediction, and my hope, that Professor Searl will be honored before he expires from this earth and remembered for being the man whose vision changed the world for the better and saved mankind from a horrible fate.

As a tribute to the Professor, I am going to write my next blog about something that has quietly squeaked by without much notice and if anything, is one of the most landmark discoveries in physics. It will undoubtedly validate what Professor Searl, in his more unorthodox manner, claimed was possible 50 years before being discovered in a truly orthodox environment. It also lays to rest one of the most unanswered questions in science - is gravity related to the other known forces? The answer is YES and along with that comes certain assumptions that one must conclude about Searl's claims. This is where people like "flowerbower" and the other closed thinkers from his YouTube video forums will have nothing more to say if they are truly "scientists" and not just looking for something to debunk because it makes them look stupid. I'll also elaborate more on this in my next blog. Stay tuned for more....